Assignment 2: litigation, censures, and fines

Points: 280

Assignment 2: Litigation, Censures, and Fines

Criteria

 

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

 

Fair

70-79% C

 

Proficient

80-89% B

 

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Insufficiently analyzed the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Insufficiently provided support for your rationale.

Partially analyzed the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily analyzed the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly analyzed the primary accounting issues which form the crux of the litigation or fine for the firm, and indicate the impact to the firm as a result of litigation or fine. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

2. Examine the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm.

Insufficiently examined the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm.

Partially examined the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm.

Satisfactorily examined the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm.

Thoroughly examined the key inferences of corporate ethics related to internal controls and accounting principles which lead to the litigation or fine for the accounting firm.

3. Evaluate the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question.

Insufficiently evaluated the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question.

Partially evaluated the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question.

Satisfactorily evaluated the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question.

Thoroughly evaluated the primary ethical standards of the accounting organization’s leadership and values which contributed to approval of the accounting issues and thus created the litigation or fines in question.

4. Identify specific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question. Next, create an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely identifiedspecific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question. Did not submit or incompletely created an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants.

Insufficiently identifiedspecific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question.Insufficientlycreated an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants.

Partially identifiedspecific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question.Partially created an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants.

Satisfactorily identifiedspecific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question.Satisfactorilycreated an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants.

Thoroughly identifiedspecific conduct violations committed by the organization and accounting firm in question.Thoroughlycreated an argument supporting the actions against the organization and accounting firm, based on the current professional code of conduct for independent auditors and management accountants.

5. Make a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Provide support for your rationale.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely made a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Did not submit or incompletely provided support for your rationale.

Insufficiently made a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Insufficiently provided support for your rationale.

Partially made a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Partially provided support for your rationale.

Satisfactorily made a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Satisfactorily provided support for your rationale.

Thoroughly made a recommendation as to how regulators and professional societies may prevent this type of behavior in question for the future. Thoroughly provided support for your rationale.

6. 2 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more