The dnp project: introduction, background and problem | NURSING | Chamberlain College of Nursing


Using ‘Commit to Sit’ to Impact Patient Satisfaction on a Pediatric Medical-Surgical Floor

          In healthcare, organizations are strategizing methods to improve the patient’s experience, by staying current and agile to meet consumer expectations and prevent mistrust and poor health outcomes.  (Lidgett, 2016; Loos, 2021; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Merel et al., 2016; Odai-Afotey et al., 2018; Shin & Park, 2018; Trotta, 2020).  Performance of person and community engagement, clinical outcomes, safety, efficiency, and cost reduction are subject to financial reimbursement through the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Value-Based Purchasing Program which has a significant impact on an organization overall well-being (Centers for Medicare, and Medicaid Services [CMS], 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017). The act of listening and effective health care communication has been linked to increased trust between patients and caregivers, improved perceptions of care,  improved health outcomes, medication compliance, patient satisfaction scores, and lower readmission rates (George et al., 2018; Gilligan et al., 2017; Loos, 2021; McCaffrey et al., 2020).  

          To best impact, these key performance and strategic measures, creating a culture that fosters a positive experience through interactions that emanate caring behaviors, staying present in the moment, empathy, and therapeutic verbal and non-verbal communications are key for organizational success (Merel et al., 2016; Orloski et al., 2019; Owens et al., 2017). The purpose of the proposed Doctor Nursing Practice (DNP) project is to improve patient satisfaction scores through the integration of the evidence-based intervention (EBI) ‘commit to sit’ to nurse rounding (George, 2018; Lidgett, 2016; Merel et al., 2016; Orloski et al., 2019; Pattison et al., 2017). This manuscript will describe an assessment of the practice problem and its significance, evidence synthesis of the intervention, translational science model and methodology, implementation plan, evaluation, and data analysis plan, and the sustainability of this EBI practice change.


          The lens around patient experience has increased significantly over the past decade. Nationally, patient and family expectations are steadily increasing and requiring changes in practices to meet their needs (Lidgett, 2016; Loos, 2021; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Merel et al., 2016; Odai-Afotey et al., 2018; Shin & Park, 2018; Trotta, 2020). Alignment to the consumers’ needs of trust and safety is critical to provide an optimal experience that yields improved health outcomes (Loos, 2021; Merel et al., 2016; Odai-Afotey et al., 2018; Shin & Park, 2018).  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Value-Based Purchasing Program established by the Affordable Care Act, provides compensation based upon the overall quality of care provided, rather than volume of services (Centers for Medicare, and Medicaid Services [CMS], 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017).  Performance and hospital reimbursement are measured by four key components: person and community engagement (25%), clinical outcomes (25%), safety (25%), and efficiency and cost reduction (25%) (CMS, 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017).  Performance related to person and community engagement or consumer satisfaction is measured through the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction survey scores (Mazurenko et al., 2017; Orloski et al., 2019; Owens et al., 2017; Trotta et al., 2020).

          The HCAHPS survey is the first national, public, and standardized, data collection repository, and benchmarking tool dedicated to ascertaining the patient’s perceptions of the care they were provided (CMS, 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Owens et al., 2017; Trotta et al., 2020).  The HCAHPS scores determine financial reimbursement from CMS, consumer trust, and reputation to remain competitive in the healthcare arena (CMS, 2018; Mazurenko et al., 2017; Owens et al., 2017; Trotta et al., 2020).  Understanding the significant impact of enhancing current practices to impact patient experience scores has on an organization it is critical for facilities to pivot from current practices and embrace new evidence-based interventions to improve the experience and health outcomes of the consumer and a more favorable financial outcome. In the United States over 7,700 HCAHPS surveys are completed daily by patients and families (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, 2021).  One dissatisfied patient can lead to a financial loss of approximately $200,000 to an institution (February & Holmes, 2020).

          On a local level, New York State data shows that a positive experience can enhance an institution’s marketability and attraction by 10%, whereas a poor experience can make a negative impact by 20%, as well as negatively impact the financial wellness and overall patient volume of an organization (February & Holmes, 2020).  For many families, the act of listening and communicating effectively has been linked to improved perceptions of care, quality health outcomes, compliance, and higher satisfaction scores (Gilligan et al., 2017; Loos, 2021). Making these connections during patient interactions makes a significant impact on the overall patient experience and satisfaction scores.  Campbell & Li (2018) discusses how both positive and negative interactions are cataloged on social media platforms and will correlate to an institution’s overall HCAHPS scores.

          At the practicum site, HCAHPS scores are tracked, trended, and analyzed to ensure alignment to the patients’ and families’ voices.  Over the past year, this organization has seen a decrease in the HCAHPS scores, particularly around the nursing communication domain.  Further analysis of the HCAHPS data revealed opportunities to improve the current practices to aid and support the nurse to stay present in the interaction and positively impact a patient’s experience (George, 2018; Lidgett, 2016; Merel et al., 2016; Orloski et al., 2019; Pattison et al., 2017).                                                                                                                                                                       


Campbell, L., & Li, Y. (2018). Are Facebook user ratings associated with hospital cost, quality     and patient satisfaction? A cross-sectional analysis of hospitals in New York State. BMJ Quality & Safety27(2), 119-129. (Links to an external site.)

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2018). Hospital consumer assessment of

healthcare providers and systems (HCAHPS) Survey. Retrieved November 4, 2021, from (Links to an external site.)

February, T., & Holmes, S. (2020). The business case for Magnet® in an international hospital. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration50(10), 533-538. (Links to an external site.)

George, S., Rahmatinick, S., & Ramos, J. (2018). Commit to sit to improve nurse   communication. Critical Care Nurse38(2), 83-85. (Links to an external site.)

Gilligan, T., Coyle, N., Frankel, R. M., Berry, D. L., Bohlke, K., Epstein, R. M., … & Baile, W.    F. (2018). Patient-clinician communication: American Society of Clinical Oncology    consensus guideline. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 73(2), 96-97. (Links to an external site.)

Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (2021). HCAHPS fact sheet. Retrieved November 26, 2021, from (Links to an external site.)

Lidgett, C. D. (2016). Improving the patient experience through a commit to sit service excellence initiative. Patient Experience Journal3(2), 67-72. (Links to an external site.)

Loos, N. M. (2021). Nurse listening as perceived by patients: How to improve the patient experience, keep patients safe, and raise HCAHPS scores. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration51(6), 324-328. (Links to an external site.)

Mazurenko, O., Collum, T., Ferdinand, A., & Menachemi, N. (2017). Predictors of hospital patient satisfaction as measured by HCAHPS: A systematic review. Journal of Healthcare Management62(4), 272-283. (Links to an external site.)

McCaffrey, R., Hale, D., Kunupakaphun, S., Kaufman, L., & Eamranond, P. (2020). A multifaceted approach to improve physician communication scores. Journal of Patient Experience7(4), 522-526. (Links to an external site.)

Merel, S. E., McKinney, C. M., Ufkes, P., Kwan, A. C., & White, A. A. (2016). Sitting at patients’ bedsides may improve patients’ perceptions of physician communication skills. Journal of Hospital Medicine11(12), 865-868. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)

Odai-Afotey, A., Kliss, A., Hafler, J., & Sanft, T. (2020). Defining the patient experience in medical oncology. Supportive Care in Cancer28(4), 1649-1658. (Links to an external site.)

Orloski, C. J., Tabakin, E. R., Shofer, F. S., Myers, J. S., & Mills, A. M. (2019). Grab a seat! Nudging providers to sit improves the patient experience in the emergency department. Journal of Patient Experience6(2), 110-116. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)

Owens, K., Eggers, J., Keller, S., & McDonald, A. (2017). The imperative of culture: A quantitative analysis of the impact of culture on workforce engagement, patient experience, physician engagement, value-based purchasing, and turnover. Journal of Healthcare Leadership9, 25. (Links to an external site.) b (Links to an external site.)

Pattison, K. H., Heyman, A., Barlow, J., & Barrow, K. (2017). Patient perceptions of sitting versus standing for nurse leader rounding. Journal of Nursing Care Quality32(1), 1-5. (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)

Shin, N., & Park, J. (2018). The effect of intentional nursing rounds based on the care model on patients’ perceived nursing quality and their satisfaction with nursing services. Asian Nursing Research12(3), 203-208. (Links to an external site.)

Trotta, R. L., Rao, A. D., McHugh, M. D., Yoho, M., & Cunningham, R. S. (2020). Moving beyond the measure: Understanding patients’ experiences of communication with nurses. Research in Nursing & Health43(6), 568-578.


Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more