Wk 8 case study | Information Systems homework help

Read the following articles available in the ACM Digital Library:

Note: The ACM Digital Library is a Strayer Library database located in iCampus > Campus & Library > Learning Resource Center > Databases. Go to https://research.strayer.edu to access A-Z Databases > ACM Digital Library or use the direct link to the database: https://libdatab.strayer.edu/login?url=http://dl.acm.org.

Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:

  1. Recommend at least three (3) specific tasks that could be performed to improve the quality of datasets, using the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology. Include a thorough description of each activity per each phase.
  2. Recommend the actions that should be performed in order to optimize record selections and to improve database performance from a quantitative data quality assessment.
  3. Suggest three (3) maintenance plans and three (3) activities that could be performed in order to improve data quality.
  4. From the software development methodologies described in the article titled, “Process-centered Review of Object Oriented Software Development Methodologies,” complete the following.
    1. Evaluate which method would be efficient for planning proactive concurrency control methods and lock granularities. Assess how your selected method can be used to minimize the database security risks that may occur within a multiuser environment. 
    2. Analyze how the method can be used to plan out the system effectively and ensure that the number of transactions does not produce record-level locking while the database is in operation.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Points: 50

Case Study: Database Development 

Criteria

Unacceptable
Below 70% F

Fair
70-79% C

Proficient
80-89% B

Exemplary
90-100% A

1. Recommend at least three (3) specific tasks that could be performed to improve the quality of datasets, using the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology. Include a thorough description of each activity per each phase.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely recommended at least three (3) specific tasks that could be performed to improve the quality of datasets, using the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology. Did not submit or incompletely included a thorough description of each activity per each phase.

Partially recommended at least three (3) specific tasks that could be performed to improve the quality of datasets, using the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology. Partially included a thorough description of each activity per each phase.

Satisfactorily recommended at least three (3) specific tasks that could be performed to improve the quality of datasets, using the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology. Satisfactorily included a thorough description of each activity per each phase.

Thoroughly recommended at least three (3) specific tasks that could be performed to improve the quality of datasets, using the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) methodology. Thoroughly included a thorough description of each activity per each phase.

2. Recommend the actions that should be performed in order to optimize record selections and to improve database performance from a quantitative data quality assessment.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely recommended the actions that should be performed in order to optimize record selections and to improve database performance from a quantitative data quality assessment.

Partially recommended the actions that should be performed in order to optimize record selections and to improve database performance from a quantitative data quality assessment.

Satisfactorily recommended the actions that should be performed in order to optimize record selections and to improve database performance from a quantitative data quality assessment.

Thoroughly recommended the actions that should be performed in order to optimize record selections and to improve database performance from a quantitative data quality assessment.

3. Suggest three (3) maintenance plans and three (3) activities that could be performed in order to improve data quality.
Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested three (3) maintenance plans and three (3) activities that could be performed in order to improve data quality.

Partially suggested three (3) maintenance plans and three (3) activities that could be performed in order to improve data quality.

Satisfactorily suggested three (3) maintenance plans and three (3) activities that could be performed in order to improve data quality.

Thoroughly suggested three (3) maintenance plans and three (3) activities that could be performed in order to improve data quality.

4a. Evaluate which method would be efficient for planning proactive concurrency control methods and lock granularities. Assess how your selected method can be used to minimize the database security risks that may occur within a multiuser environment. 
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated which method would be efficient for planning proactive concurrency control methods and lock granularities. Did not submit or incompletely assessed how your selected method can be used to minimize the database security risks that may occur within a multiuser environment.

Partially evaluated which method would be efficient for planning proactive concurrency control methods and lock granularities. Partially assessed how your selected method can be used to minimize the database security risks that may occur within a multiuser environment.

Satisfactorily evaluated which method would be efficient for planning proactive concurrency control methods and lock granularities. Satisfactorily assessed how your selected method can be used to minimize the database security risks that may occur within a multiuser environment.

Thoroughly evaluated which method would be efficient for planning proactive concurrency control methods and lock granularities. Thoroughly assessed how your selected method can be used to minimize the database security risks that may occur within a multiuser environment.

4b. Analyze how the verify method can be used to plan out system effectively and ensure that the number of transactions do not produce record-level locking while the database is in operation.
Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed how the verify method can be used to plan out system effectively and ensure that the number of transactions do not produce record-level locking while the database is in operation.

Partially analyzed how the verify method can be used to plan out system effectively and ensure that the number of transactions do not produce record-level locking while the database is in operation.

Satisfactorily analyzed how the verify method can be used to plan out system effectively and ensure that the number of transactions do not produce record-level locking while the database is in operation.

Thoroughly analyzed how the verify method can be used to plan out system effectively and ensure that the number of transactions do not produce record- level locking while the database is in operation.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more